The double destructive effect of hoarding money resulting from corruption

The double destructive effect of hoarding money resulting from corruption

2026-07-03

Hoarding money is the act of keeping cash liquidity and freezing it away from circulation and investment (whether in homes or locked safes).

It is one of the phenomena that profoundly affects the structure of the economy and negatively impacts the movement of money in its natural cycle.

The most dangerous forms of hoarding:

The most dangerous form of hoarding is not that resulting from legitimate saving, but rather the hoarding of money obtained from financial and administrative corruption.

The corrupt person often cannot invest his money in a normal way for fear of revealing its illegal source, so he resorts to hiding it, smuggling it, or freezing it outside the economic cycle.

Herein lies the double destructive effect: corruption drains public funds and deprives them of their developmental purposes, then hoarding prevents those funds from returning to the national economy and productive investment, thus compounding economic and social losses.

The effects of this phenomenon on the individual and society:

First: The economic impact on the individual in general (hoarding in homes)

Although the hoarder believes he is achieving financial security, the actual outcome in the medium and long term is different, as follows:

1. Erosion of purchasing power (inflation):

Frozen money does not grow, and in contrast, the prices of goods and services rise over time. This means that the purchasing power of the hoarded amount gradually decreases; a thousand dinars today will not buy the same goods after a few years.

2. Loss of growth opportunities (opportunity cost):

By depriving oneself of the returns of real investment (real estate, industrial, or commercial) or even safe investment, the individual loses the “compound profits” that could have contributed to improving his standard of living.

3. Stagnation in the development of family wealth:

Freezing cash prevents an individual from developing their skills, expanding their business, or securing sustainable productive assets for their family, making their wealth “dead wealth” that does not generate new money.

Second: The impact of hoarding on the average citizen (consumer and worker)

The citizen who does not have the luxury of hoarding and depends on his daily or monthly income is the first victim of the culture of societal hoarding, and this is evident in the details of his daily life:

1. Scarcity of job opportunities and low wages:

When the wealthy or middle class hoard their money, the liquidity available for starting new projects (factories, shops, construction companies) shrinks. This shrinkage means fewer job opportunities for ordinary citizens and creates a stagnant labor market, giving employers the power to lower or keep wages low to increase the supply of labor in the face of low demand.

2. Difficulty in obtaining personal financing: Banks do not lend from their own funds, but rather re-lend citizens’ deposits. The lack of deposits due to hoarding at home causes banks to raise the cost of lending (interest rates). As a result, the average citizen finds it extremely difficult to obtain an affordable loan to buy a home, start a small business, or cover education and medical expenses.

3. High cost of living (stagflationary paradox):

In some cases, the lack of circulating liquidity leads the state to resort to alternative methods of financing its budget, such as increasing indirect taxes or fees on services that directly affect the average citizen, thus burdening his livelihood.

Third: The economic impact on society and the state:

In economics, money represents the “blood” that nourishes the arteries of the market. Withholding this cash leads to a near-paralysis of the economic cycle.

1. Contraction of liquidity and decline in purchasing power:

When large amounts of cash leave circulation, effective market demand decreases. This contraction forces businesses and factories to reduce their production due to declining sales.

2. Disruption of development projects and increase in unemployment:

The modern economy relies on converting savings into investments through formal channels (banks, stock exchanges, investment funds). Hoarding deprives startups and established companies of the necessary financing for expansion, leading to business stagnation, reduced job opportunities, and consequently, higher unemployment rates.

3. Impeding the state’s monetary policy:

Central banks face significant difficulty in managing the money supply and guiding the economy (through tools such as interest rates) if a large proportion of money is moving in the “shadow economy” or is hidden entirely outside the banking and regulatory system.

4. Declining economic growth rates:

The gross domestic product (GDP) is declining as a result of the slowdown in buying, selling, and investment, which puts society in a state of continuous stagnation instead of development and prosperity.

5. Deepening the class divide and social unrest: When vast sums of money are concentrated in closed coffers without being circulated through society as wages and investments, the gap between the rich and poor widens. This imbalance weakens social cohesion and increases crime rates, theft, and a general sense of frustration, especially among young people unable to enter the job market.

a summary:

In economic and social thought, money is a means of exchange and a tool for production, not an end in itself. Therefore, transforming it from “working capital” to “hoarded cash” represents a waste of opportunities for progress and turns wealth from a factor for building and development into a tool for stifling human and economic potential.

Moreover, the money obtained from corruption not only impoverishes the state when it is seized, but continues to impoverish society when it is hoarded or smuggled out of the economic cycle. It strikes the economy twice: first by stealing public resources, and second by depriving the market of liquidity, investment, and job opportunities.

Therefore, combating corruption is not just about recovering looted funds, but also about returning those funds to the productive economic cycle, thereby achieving development, promoting social justice, and restoring confidence in state institutions.

Baghdad – 2026

shafaq.com