Iraq’s Public Sector Crisis: The Solution: The Free Market and the Private Sector

Iraq’s Public Sector Crisis: The Solution: The Free Market and the Private Sector

3-14-2025

Iraqs Public Sector Crisis - The Solution - The Free Market and the Private SectorResearcher Shaza Khalil*
In recent years, Iraq has faced significant economic challenges, particularly in the public sector. The government’s dominance over key industries, its inability to provide high-quality services, and the inefficiency of its state-owned enterprises are hampering the country’s potential. Despite Iraq’s vast natural resources, government intervention in vital sectors such as telecommunications and infrastructure has proven ineffective, burdening taxpayers and exacerbating the national economic situation. This article examines the weakness of Iraq’s public sector, monopoly practices, and the need to empower the private sector and promote a market economy to achieve sustainable economic balance.

Government Monopoly on 5G Services:
One of the most glaring examples of the government’s inability to provide high-quality services is its attempt to control the telecommunications sector via 5G. The government’s monopoly on 5G services raises several pressing questions:

Is the government qualified to effectively manage the telecom sector?
Should the National Pension Fund be involved in such high-risk projects?
Is it worth risking the money of millions of retirees in a sector plagued by inefficiency and corruption?
These questions highlight the larger issue of excessive government intervention in industries that could be more efficient and effective if controlled by private companies. The private sector can introduce innovation, improve service quality, and foster competition—all of which are stifled when the government monopolizes these markets. The public sector’s inability to provide high-quality, affordable services has been a persistent problem in Iraq, and this service is unlikely to improve once state control is extended to new technologies like 5G.

A Glimpse into the Struggles of State-Owned Enterprises in Iraq
. A study published in 2022 by the Iraq-Britain Business Council (IBBC) sheds light on the reality of state-owned enterprises in Iraq and their impact on the national economy. The study offers some key insights:

Industrial production is dominated by 176 state-owned enterprises, employing more than 600,000 people. However, the country faces chronic problems such as poor quality, high costs, and inefficiency. These enterprises are supposed to provide services and stimulate economic growth, but they often do the opposite.

Problems of state-owned enterprises in Iraq:

High costs and poor quality: State-owned enterprises provide low-quality services, and citizens are forced to pay inflated prices for unsatisfactory services. This hinders consumer satisfaction and economic productivity.

Lack of profits: About 80% of these companies lose money, despite receiving significant financial support from the government. The inefficient use of resources leads to the waste of public funds, which could be better spent in other sectors of the economy.

High rates of excess unemployment: Government-owned enterprises suffer from excess unemployment, as many workers are not utilized effectively. This lost efficiency leads to a waste of human resources and limits job creation in more dynamic sectors.

Negative impact on the private sector: State-owned enterprises often crowd out private companies, reducing their ability to grow and compete. This limits the country’s overall economic growth potential and prevents the private sector from reaching its full potential.

Environmental damage: Many state-owned industries are major contributors to environmental pollution, causing far more harmful environmental impacts than private companies.

Politics and Corruption: State-owned enterprises are often run by political parties, facilitating corruption, favoritism, and inefficiency. This prevents companies from operating on sound economic principles, further deteriorating the country’s economic situation.

The Failure of Centralized Economic Models: Lessons from the Past
The experience of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in Iraq is a stark reminder of the failure of centralized, state-controlled economic models. These models were abandoned decades ago by countries around the world in favor of market-based solutions. The lack of competition, inefficiency, and corruption in SOEs in Iraq reflect broader shortcomings in the government’s approach to managing the economy.

At a time when Iraq faces significant challenges related to budgetary and financing issues, mismanagement, and corruption, the continued expansion of the state’s role in economic sectors such as telecommunications increases the burden. The government should focus on enabling infrastructure development, such as the construction of roads, airports, and ports, by attracting private investment rather than attempting to directly manage these sectors.

The Need for Private Sector Participation and the Promotion of a Market Economy
Iraq’s economic future depends on the transition from state-controlled capitalism to a more liberal, market-based economy. The private sector, given the right freedom and support, can deliver better outcomes in terms of efficiency, innovation, and service quality. It is essential that Iraq move toward enhancing private participation in vital sectors such as telecommunications, infrastructure, and industry.

Attracting private investment: Instead of the state intervening in sectors where it lacks a comparative advantage, Iraq should actively attract private investment. This will enhance competition, reduce costs, and improve the quality of services across various industries.

Promoting the free market: A market economy encourages the efficient allocation of resources, stimulates technological innovation, and creates jobs. It is essential that Iraq gradually transitions toward creating a regulatory environment where private enterprises can flourish, free from excessive state intervention and monopolies.

Conclusion: Moving Away from Monopolies and Embracing the Free Market
Continued government interference in vital sectors such as telecommunications and infrastructure has led to inefficiency, corruption, and waste of resources. It is clear that the public sector, in its current form, is ill-equipped to handle the challenges of a modern economy. By reducing its role to regulatory oversight and focusing on creating an environment that encourages private sector growth, Iraq can achieve a dynamic economy that meets the needs of its citizens.

The private sector and market economic principles are the most appropriate and successful option for ensuring economic growth, creating jobs, and improving the quality of services. It is time for Iraq to abandon its failed state-led economic policies and embrace the potential of a competitive market economy. Only through this can Iraq achieve sustainable growth and maintain a balanced economic future.

Economic Studies Unit / North America Office

rawabetcenter.com