The coordinating framework studies the option of renewal for Mustafa Al-Kazemi to avoid scenarios that were the most bittersweet

The coordinating framework studies the option of renewal for Mustafa Al-Kazemi to avoid scenarios that were the most bittersweet


The coordinating framework studies the option of renewal for Mustafa Al-Kazemi to avoid scenarios that were the most bittersweetThe coordinating framework forces are studying all the options available to them to get out of the political crisis in Iraq with the lightest possible damage, with the expiry of twelve days from the forty-day period set by the leader of the Sadrist movement, Muqtada al-Sadr, to settle the crisis before returning the ball to him.

Leaks revealed that forces from within the framework see that maintaining Mustafa Al-Kazemi’s government, while making ministerial amendments to it, may be the most realistic and appropriate option in light of the current political blockage, especially with the Sadrist movement not showing any cooperation or response to the initiative put forward by the framework to form the largest parliamentary bloc .

The coordination framework – which constitutes the political umbrella for the forces loyal to Iran – previously expressed reluctance to re-assign the current prime minister to form the next government, considering that Al-Kazemi’s positions and policies constituted a heavy burden on him during the past two years, especially his position on Iranian influence and militia weapons.

Observers believe that the current crisis is forcing the framework to search for alternative options and from outside the box, in light of the conviction among its leaders that there is no hope in betting on a settlement with the current whose leader adheres to his negative retreat, pending the expiration of the deadline that ends after the Eid holiday to return the helm of managing the political process to him. .

Wael Al-Rikabi: After the renewal of Al-Halbousi, the renewal of the premiership has become possible
The State of Law coalition, led by former Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, expressed on Thursday the possibility of supporting the renewal option for Al-Kazemi, noting that his conservative position in the past was based on a principled premise, which is not to renew the three presidencies.

And coalition member Wael al-Rikabi explained on Thursday that “the prime ministership is a Shiite entitlement, just as the presidency of the republic belongs to the Kurds, and the parliament presidency is the entitlement of the Sunnis.

He said, “The framework was clear in its position, which is not to renew the three presidencies, but after he renewed the tripartite alliance of Parliament Speaker Muhammad al-Halbousi, it became possible for the presidency and the prime minister.”

The position expressed by a member of the State of Law coalition confirms that the framework has taken into account the option of renewal for Al-Kazemi, and what reinforces this trend is the decline of criticism directed at the latter, as leaders in the framework did not leave an occasion without correcting the current prime minister, and confirming their absolute refusal to re-assign him .

Iraqi observers say that one of the reasons that prompted some of the leaders of the framework to reconsider their position on Al-Kazemi is their fear that Al-Sadr, after the deadline, will revive the 2020 scenario when the current prime minister was assigned to form a government to succeed the government of Adel Abdul-Mahdi, who was forced to resign against the backdrop of the protests. which erupted in October of 2019.

Observers make it clear that al-Sadr may call on the current government to submit its resignation, and this will force the President of the Republic, Barham Salih, to invite the candidate of the largest bloc to form the new government, otherwise Iraq will not only fall into a constitutional vacuum, but also into an institutional vacuum.

The “Save a Homeland” coalition, which is led by the Sadrist movement and includes the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Sunni Sovereignty Alliance, announced last March that it is the largest parliamentary bloc. At the time, the coalition nominated Muqtada al-Sadr’s cousin, Jaafar al-Sadr, Iraq’s ambassador to Britain, to head the government.

Observers say that the coordination framework has no reservations about Jaafar al-Sadr, and his leaders have previously confirmed this, but they refuse to single out the Sadrist movement to form a government, and thus exclude it from the political equation.

The Sadrist movement believes that holding new elections may be the best option for it in light of the belief prevailing in its ranks that it has enough capabilities to enhance its electoral status.

Observers point out that one of the motives that compel the framework to seriously consider the option of renewing Al-Kazemi, is the fear that the Sadrist movement will pressure towards dissolving Parliament and going towards new legislative elections.

The forces affiliated with the framework had suffered a severe loss in the previous entitlement, which took place on the tenth of October, and feared that they would find themselves facing a new electoral bleeding, rendering them really unable to impose their conditions in the political process.

On the other hand, the Sadrist movement believes that holding new elections may be the best option for it, in light of the belief prevailing among its leaders that it has enough capabilities to enhance its electoral status so that opponents lose the weapon of the “blocking third” that they have employed extensively in confronting his political project.

Leaders in the framework returned to attacking the Sadrist movement after a short truce. State lawmaker Jawad al-Ghazali said, “Some political blocs that are trying to control the political scene have tendencies that are not in the interest of the Iraqi street, and prefer their personal interests at the expense of the country.”

The representative of the State of Law explained that “the current political scene needs a pause and cooperation from all the heads of the blocs and parties of the political process, considering the people’s interest as supreme and the basis, and staying away from personal interests and avoiding them because they do not provide a benefit as much as they provide special benefits,” noting that “the current circumstance is considered It is cruel and the Iraqi people suffer in all its forms and manifestations.”