Lawyers expect to postpone the pronouncement of the ruling on the annulment of the election results
Lawyers expect to postpone the pronouncement of the ruling on the annulment of the election results
12-12-2021 07:18 AM
Two legal experts expected the Federal Court to postpone the verdict in the lawsuit submitted by the leader of the Al-Fateh Alliance Hadi Al-Amiri to “cancel the election results” to another day, attributing the postponement to “political” reasons or to complete the evidence.
The legal expert, Tariq Harb, considered that the Federal Court should either postpone the verdict in the lawsuit of the head of the Al-Fateh Alliance, scheduled for tomorrow, Monday, or consider it the “session” as a continuation of the previous sessions.
In an interview, Harb suggested that the ruling would not be pronounced due to the current political conditions, and the “federal” desire to take note of the case from its legal aspects, explaining that the postponement would be for a short time that would not exceed three days.
In the same context, legal expert Haider Al-Sufi went to the expectation of his colleague Harb, to postpone tomorrow’s session, Monday, to scrutinize or for more time in drafting the ruling. Al-Sufi said: The Federal Court is independent and is not subject to pressure, and there is no interest for anyone to pressure it, explaining that the political parties are all with the case resolved as soon as possible.
He added that the approval of the election results is contingent on the court’s decision on the case, indicating that the federal government needs more time to examine the evidence submitted to it. Al-Sufi added that it is possible that the decision on the case may be postponed for other reasons, such as the court deems it necessary to hear the opinion of legal experts, or To inquire of the plaintiff regarding the evidence presented by him.
He pointed out that the judiciary is not in a hurry to issue its ruling in important and dangerous cases, and it is obliged to slow down in order to check the evidence and take into account the rights of the two parties to the case, “the caller and the defendant”, as confirmed by the constitution, noting that it is very natural for the ratification of the election results to be delayed until a decision is made. the case, because the appeals affect the results in such cases, it is also not known how many times the delay , according to court conditions and the need for Oukt.qanonyan: pronunciation session by virtue of a lawsuit to cancel the
election results delayed
dijlah.tv
