US Congress refused to vote for paving the use of military force against Daash

US Congress refused to vote for paving the use of military force against Daash

12.6.2015 twenty-seven past four p.m.

US Congress refused to vote for paving the use of military force against Daash[Follow-where]
the voice of the US Congress rejected a formal mandate allows the use of military force against al Daash, and this comes in the light of the military developments in Iraq and hit and run operations between Iraqi forces and terrorists Daash.
US President Barack Obama had asked in February of Congress to approve a mandate allowing the use of military force against Daash.
However, the Congress voice Thursday rejected a draft law for the defense was force them to vote on the official authorization to use military force against Daash.
and the voice of the US House a majority of 231 votes to 196 to reject the amendment, which was sponsored by Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, with the voice of the Republicans who control the majority of council seats to a large extent against the amendment, while supported by the Democrats in general.
Note that the amendment in the form of approval was would be required Congress to discuss the new mandate and vote on it By March 31 / March 2016 prohibits the use of funds in the project defense Appropriations Act next year in air strikes campaign against al Daash that Congress approve the mandate.
A vote was taken in Congress, one day after Obama’s version is sending 450 additional US soldiers to Iraq to assist and train Iraqi forces that seek to restore land dominated by Daash.
A statement issued by the White House that the US President took the decision to strengthen the group US military advisers based on the recommendations of the US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey.
According to the spokesman White House spokesman Josh Ernest, the additional group of military trainers Americans will be transferred to the base [progress] in Anbar province, but stressed that “these additional troops would play a combat role”, stressing that it only will strengthen the group American trainers stationed in Iraq, who are training Only Iraqi security forces, and numbering three thousand and a hundred currently element.
Contrary to what was announced by Dempsey Thursday that the United States was considering the establishment of more US military bases in Iraq, he said a spokesman for the White House, there was no immediate or concrete plans to establish new bases in Iraq. ” .anthy

alliraqnews.com