The Guardian: Daash Mosul was collect eight million dollars a month
The Guardian: Daash Mosul was collect eight million dollars a month
06/18/2014 (00:01 pm)
translation term
That offers a Daash was the result of decisions awesome taken since 2003, and the Iraqis themselves charting a new course if they want to keep their state alive.
in the tenth of June, published a set Daash – which scared by the world over the past few days – a picture of fighters who are clearing barriers between Syria and Iraq. They claim that removing the limits of Sykes-Picot agreement of 1916, which divided the Middle East into areas of French and British.
was such destruction is symbolic of the border to try to give credibility to the claim that it erase states and a fake created by the European powers, and the unification of the Muslims in the community of pious uniform.
most unusual that this attempt found sympathy among the critics of the policy of the European and U.S. who are looking for solutions to problems that destabilize countries in the region, where they claim that Iraq and Syria are the countries creature did not earn the loyalty of their people, and the political legitimacy of the People’s found only in small units homogenous religiously and ethnically reflect states used by the Ottoman Empire for the management of the region before 1914.
these allegations – which launched Daash and some Westerners – are false allegations historically and socially. During the last week of this group claimed that it took control of the city of Mosul, and not only that, but the biggest military forces expelled them larger and stolen them sophisticated weapons and Iraqi coins worth hundreds of millions of dollars. This speed of concern in the progress of this group toward Baghdad have been used as evidence of Iraq’s artificially and divisive nature of the population. But the truth is more complicated and less pessimistic. Was set Daash – like its predecessor al-Qaida in Iraq – a strong presence since the time in Mosul, were exploiting the chaos and lawlessness which caused them the U.S. invasion in 2003.
at the beginning of this year and expanded the group control of Mosul and took the kill local government officials and extorting eight million dollars a month for Tax protection. But the expansion of the connector to other cities north of the country was the result of the failure of the Iraqi government and the legacy of the invasion and not synth historic Iraqi state.
current Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki came to power the first time in April 2006 through a deal brokered by Jack Straw, the British foreign secretary then and Condoleezza Rice, the secretary Foreign America. The rise of al-Maliki, trying to create a facade of democracy amid civil war that followed the invasion. After 2006 Maliki used his authority to govern bossy approach, using the judicial system is compatible with strong security forces and million-strong fighters to suppress dissent. 2010 elections cast doubt on his judgment, where the Iraqi List got 91 seats while Maliki’s bloc got 89 seats.
Ironically, the United States and Iran have supported the continuation of the rule of al-Maliki, under the pretext of predictability and order despite losing in the elections. The formation of a government of national unity, given the existing Iraqi Ministry of Defense consolation to them.
upwards of 2010, Maliki began breaking popularity of the Iraqi List. In 2013 to get rid Maliki and Minister of Finance Muqtadir a broad popular Rafie al-Issawi through charges of terrorism, what caused the demonstrations of mass country’s west and north.
This failure to build a political system that a comprehensive and sustainable after the change of the former regime, and shed Maliki candidate America for prime minister are the reason behind the emergence of Daash In the current crisis, not phantom alleged foundation of the state.
what the U.S. government is supposed to do which is facing the people angry and upset as well as “Islamist insurgency” violent? I’ve passed by President Obama earlier this week that “Iraq needs us and the international community more help,” did not rule out U.S. support for Iraq, said Friday that “the United States would not interfere in military action in the absence of a political plan Iraqi ensure us that they are willing to work together.”
of Clearly, the Obama administration focused on providing military support to the owners asking him not to leave power or to change his approach to governing the country.
simply, the processing of the Iraqi army with more weapons will not solve this deep crisis, and the dismantling of the Iraqi state will not achieve stability. Instead of all that, the United States and the international community to encourage the Iraqis to reform their political institutions. It should also encourage political parties struggling for fiscal rectitude and citizenship and equal rights – and not the parties that follow publicly agendas sectarian such as Hizb al-Maliki.
sweep arrogant in 2003 and his plans failed in the engineering community radical that led to the current crisis, not the Iraqi state. Who wants to see a stable Iraq democratically, must support the heroic Iraqi people, which still exists and is trying to build a new country from the ground up.
almadapaper.net
