Tariq Harb: constitutionally permissible to vote on the defense and interior ministers collectively
Tariq Harb: constitutionally permissible to vote on the defense and interior ministers collectively
10/07/2014 15:30
Follow-up – and babysit – said legal expert Tareq Harb that he “may be constitutionally parliamentary vote on the Minister of Interior and Minister of Defense collectively any in one basket and one vote, because the constitution and rules of procedure stipulated voting individually any there be a vote for each minister separately in the case of a candidate for the post of prime minister to form a government at all. ”
He continued war in a statement today received news agency public opinion (and babysit), a copy of it, that the constitution and rules of procedure did not stipulate that in other cases in accordance with the provisions of Article 76 of the Constitution and Article 49 of the Rules of Procedure of the House of Representatives and this is what happened a few days ago in the parliament session, which Granting the confidence of the government where voting was individually minister but now Van, which provides the names of Ministers is the Prime Minister and not the candidate-designate to form a government as well as the subject now, is not to form a government, but regards the addition of new ministers to the government was formed so there is no requirement of the Constitution and the rules of voting solo any vote on each name separately for ministers who join the government after its formation as a state and the defense and interior ministers also that there are precedents parliamentary vote collectively rather than individually, as happened when the vote on the Vice President Nuri al-Maliki and Iyad Allawi, Osama al-Nujaifi and, as happened in 2008 where he took the parliament vote collectively on the 3 laws once is provincial law and the General Amnesty Law and the Budget Law. ”
He added that “this constitutional interpretation reduces the severity of disputes policy on candidates first, as it represents a response to the need for urgent and pressing for the existence of these two ministers Secondly, there is no where to move away from the provisions of the Constitution and the rules of procedure and this is what we wish it to be after the end of the holiday, the Parliamentary Day 14/10 / 2014. ” Q, Q
alrayy.com
