It’s time to take a strong stance towards the Government of Iraq

It’s time to take a strong stance towards the Government of Iraq

30/10/2012 (23:00 pm)

 translation term

During two terms in the United States, acted government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki in an atmosphere of impunity, at which time I tried it the American administration to focus on calming Iraq and find a way to leave, and for fear of how reflection criticized Iraq on U.S. policy, the approach Washington to deal with other issues , at a time when Iraq is dealing harshly with the interests of the American strategy in the region. says a report published by Reuters last month, said Iraq had sent dozens of tons of weapons, through Iraqi airspace to Syria (on a daily basis almost) and, according to New York Times, (buses ) almost daily, carrying visitors to places of religious Shiite in Syria also carried weapons and fighters in support of the Assad regime. Naturally, the Obama administration was demanding Iraq to stop it, but the response has been rough and were required to condemn the disposal of Iraq and demand of Iraqis to desist from such conduct or face loss of friendship with the United States, and that means it’s a loss 1.7 billion of U.S. aid currently mandated to Iraq, and also the end applauded weapons with the United States. Iraqi government responsible helping arm the Assad regime for prolonging the conflict that has killed thousands of people, and destabilize Lebanon and the threat of dragging Turkey and Jordan to him. was Iraq could provide greater assistance, the pressure experienced by Iran over its nuclear program threatens its economy, and Iran is able to reject its close neighbor, even if Iraq has refused to use the air space in earnest, it is difficult to imagine a response Iran so , and despite the fact that the escalation of Iranian influence in Iraqi politics was evident shortly after the fall of Saddam Hussein, via Shi’ite solidarity, the Iraqi National still ready to express themselves often, writings hostile to Iran, and the government of Nuri al-Maliki may be happy to play paper sectarian when adapted to, but in the end goes on the impact of single-minded commitment, in order to keep his regime. Maliki, based on that idea, would not provide a preference for wrong choices and illogical to allow to help the Assad regime at its borders. It helps the Iranian regime, who brokered the return to power, and is therefore also against the rise of Sunni power in Syria, which is that he could spark a civil war in Iraq, so the U.S. government to change accounts Maliki and put them in line to American interests. To achieve this matter, the American president next increase costs Iraq in tracking the activities of his current, and could even be imminent threat to boycott financially and also to undermine the Maliki government publicly. there another part of the Syrian crisis, the U.S. has to deal strongly and roughness with Maliki regime to prevent Iraq descent into fascism, and despite the fact that the Maliki government first, had some success, including the attack on the Shiite militia in Basra in 2008, the Iraqi Prime Minister became increasingly obsessed with ambition dictatorship. , and some of his actions may have led to an increase sectarian tensions Iraq has cut a deal with the Sadrists, who led by Muqtada al-Sadr, and a retreat from his promise to the Iraqi coalition with majority Sunni, and also hunt Sunni politicians. addition to that, the Maliki government plagued by incompetence and corruption and contempt for human rights, as the Iraqi citizens began to lose confidence in government democratic system, as Maliki began ignores independent organizations, including the Election Commission and the CBI, and placed under the authority of direct, and it’s the most dangerous control central Iraqi security forces and placed under his hands, refusing to appoint ministers permanent Ministry of Defense, Ministry of Interior, and the National Security Council. short Van Maliki heads a political system متداعيا in Iraq, and the United States do not do something about what is happening, In 2011, President Obama announced the end of the Iraq war and promised Iraqis strengthen their institutions, but America had promised and did nothing, United States has the ability to distort the Maliki government the world stage, and in addition to that, restricting aid and strengthen their support for the Iraqi opposition parties. Whatever the means, the next U.S. president accountable Maliki government for abuse of power in Iraq, and its role in the re-arming Bashar al-Assad.

almadapaper