Integrity challenging the decision of the judiciary in the release of al-Jubouri, and the closure of the case against him
Integrity challenging the decision of the judiciary in the release of al-Jubouri, and the closure of the case against him
11.8.2016 13:51
[Oan- Baghdad]
announced the Integrity Commission, challenged the decision of the judiciary in the release of House Speaker Salim al – Jubouri, in a case questioning Defense Minister Khaled al – Obeidi , and the accusations made by the Jabouri of corruption and extortion.
According to a brief statement of the Commission received by all of Iraq [where] a copy of it, that it ” has challenged the decision of the private judiciary to close the proceedings in the case to question the Minister of Defense.”
The Defense Minister Khaled al – Obeidi, on Wednesday revealed his intention tomorrow [today] Thursday, challenged the decision of the judiciary in the release of House Speaker Salim al – Jubouri , for lack of evidence in the corruption charges.
Obeidi said in a press statement “Masdr of judicial decision Sentan done in the presence of many witnesses with them gripping and documents related to terrorism and corruption , ” he said . “what you’ve done is not a political struggle does not look any political future. ”
the Jubouri might like Tuesday, before the courts after the lifting of legal his immunity by parliament, to face charges of minister of defense.
he announced the elimination in a statement that the closure of the case against al – Jubouri , as stated in words and defense Minister accusations that her face during interrogation session because the evidence earned the right of the accused is not enough. ”
said legal expert Tareq Harb, said the release of the judiciary from the Speaker of the House” does not mean his innocence of the charges of corruption against him by the Minister of defense. ”
he said the war’s [where],” The release of al – Jubouri , for lack of evidence does not It means that he is innocent of the charges against him Valbrah mean there is no evidence but originally released for insufficient means there was no evidence against him but not sufficient for his conviction with evidence that the law gives the right to return to these measures within two years if someone offers new evidence. ”
alliraqnews.com
