Democracy in Iraq without the Democrats and the election is just a game to divide the spoils between corrupt elites

“The New York Times:” Democracy in Iraq without the Democrats and the election is just a game to divide the spoils between corrupt elites

Published 29/10/2013 08:00 AM

Democracy in Iraq without the Democrats and the election is just a game to divide the spoils between corrupt elitesWashington – “arenas of liberation” of Ali Al-Shammari
Stressed the “New York Times” reported that the U.S. President Obama’s claim Maliki, who سيلتقيه in Hantn to “take into account democratic standards as a condition to help the U.S..”
The newspaper said in a report that “al-Maliki did not abide by the partnership and Obama surprised when he saw back to Baghdad (in late 2011) and begin the implementation of authoritarian repression against members of the Sunni leaders backed partnership government of the United States. ”

The newspaper said the U.S. and widespread that “the violence in Iraq had reached levels not seen since 2008, also gained Qaeda more power and increased the threat of militia Shiite and increased fears of a return circles revenge sectarian.”
The newspaper noted that “al-Maliki carried out a systematic campaign to consolidate power and purge forces security is loyal to his authority, “adding that” the doctrine of the rule of al-Maliki is based on the desire to stay and for him there is nationalism and sectarian ideologies as they are tools to achieve political reconciliation. ”
the newspaper asserted that “the Iraqi election is just a game to divide the spoils among corrupt elites and the government get huge profits from oil exports, but they fail to provide basic services while living nearly a quarter of the Iraqis under the poverty line. ”
With saw “New York Times” reported that “the fight against terrorism represents the common interest of Iraq and America,” but it اردفت “but with a ready-Maliki to seek a mandate third in 2014, it is the duty of Mr. Obama to insist on adherence to democratic standards as a condition for U.S. assistance, “adding,” at a time when the United States continues to condemn terrorism must also condemn human rights violations in Iraq and its democracy without democrats. ”
In a related context advised the newspaper that “the United States must seem as supportive of the Iraqi people as a whole and does not favor any faction or a particular person, Maliki offend translation of American support for his government that he delegated the behavior of tenacious in order to stay in power, while worthy of Iraqis are better than that” .

altahreernews.com