The New York Times show that Obama’s strategy in Iraq is not “resolute”
The New York Times show that Obama’s strategy in Iraq is not “resolute”
06/19/2015
the newspaper “New York Times” the US pointed to US President Barack Obama’s strategy failed to train Iraqi forces and send military advisers to Iraq.
The newspaper said the “strategy is not resolute and reflect the confusion and clear and will fail in the fight against Daash.” She added that “Obama may be forced to engage US ground forces in battles later, despite his pledge not to any ground intervention. ” She drew the “New York Times” to “Past experience failure despite sending hundreds of thousands of troops and exchange of billions of dollars”, but they talked about their success in the areas of Anbar since 2006 to its dependence on the partnership with the tribes Iraqi. also reported that “the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq in two thousand and eleven cause a vacuum and clear,” adding that “the former prime minister and current deputy prime Republic Nuri al-Maliki took advantage of the vacuum and the Iraqi army ruined and used it to promote sectarianism.” US analysts promised that “the training of Iraqi forces It is moving in favor of one political party and that US funds flowed through Baghdad to the Shiite militias. ” Adding that “what is worse, it is the expansion of Iran’s influence in Iraq, therefore, the money and support should head directly to the regular army and the Sunni tribes and Kurdish forces, rather than she went to the Iranian-backed Shiite militias.”
rudaw.net
