Nuclear deal with Iran: AC Congress and the White House impulsive
Nuclear deal with Iran: AC Congress and the White House impulsive
14-04-2015 01:28 PM
Stepped up White House campaign statements to counter the torrent objections to the US Congress on the Framework Agreement signed by the Obama administration finally with the Iranian side after marathon negotiations that brought the two sides and with international participation to stop Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for a gradual easing of sanctions meted out by the West, led by the United States.
He described many monitors the status of American leadership now about the findings in the Iranian nuclear file. He put “unenviable Obama and his team” who spent a long time to get to the final version of the agreement. Torrent objections adopted by most of the congressmen link (Democrats and Republicans) internal electoral calculations not put forward obsessed seriously in most of the comments and analyzes concerned the political affairs of the US. The bill proposed by Senator Bob Corker has been approved and support the deputies of the Democratic Party in the direction of the suspension of the agreement spent Foreign Minister Kerry with his Iranian counterpart Zarif. Adopters of the proposed draft law has affirmed that “the agreement with Iran formula holds within it a threat to global security for the lack of seriousness to stop the Iranian nuclear project grave”, which was confirmed by Bob Corker itself in many statements. While The White House defended the choice and said that the framework agreement is “a real way out of the Iranian nuclear crisis,” in the words of the spokeswoman National Security Council of the White House on behalf of Bernadette Meehan. necessity of drafting a law to stop Obama pledges with Iran Bob Corker: American politician, was born in South Carolina a year 1952, in the Republican Party, a member since 2001. Elected Vice congressional mandate Tinasa the year 2007 , said Republican Senator in the US Congress, Bob Corker, after the meeting of his council, that “most of the House of Representatives in the US Senate do not look to the Framework Agreement signed by the Obama administration with Iranian party positive outlook, and the House of Representatives to move quickly to enact a law that bans may catastrophe will take place in the future of the Middle East and the whole world. ” said Democratic Senator Tim Kaine, who helped Bob Corker in the drafting of the bill, said he does not support the US nuclear negotiations with Iran in this manner, it does not Can Congress allowed to negotiate on sanctions imposed without the opinion. ” said Republican Senator Bob Corker, support for the Congress’s role in the consideration of the implications of the agreement between the West and the United States under the leadership of Iran. He said, “I firmly believe that it should be for Congress a veto over any agreement. ” Corker said that many Democrats (Barack Obama convinced Party), the view of the Republicans need to enter Congress in a “dangerous” agreement such as what happened with the Iranians in recent days. According to the draft law Corker gives Congress 60 days to review the agreement and during this period being suspended ease sanctions can members of Congress to vote on whether they agree or disagree on sanctions. This means that the probability of America’s retreat from the agreements with Iran, which was drafted and signed in the last meeting in Geneva, quite out of the question. He agreed Corker to amend the wording, which is not taking Congress for any action as an approval of the agreement and that Congress will consider only the issue of easing sanctions adopted by not the entire agreement. In the following days the White House and its allies have sought to find ways to ease the bill further to include steps such as demanding to brief members of Congress on a regular basis over the progress regarding the implementation of the agreement, and also put a quick process to restore sanctions if Iran violated the terms of the agreement. Most of Representatives in Congress do not look to the Framework Agreement signed by the Obama administration with the Iranian side, a positive outlook has Democrats joined Republicans in supporting the bill giving Congress a chance to approve the easing of sanctions on Iran or reject any nuclear deal being reached and approached the formation of a majority US President Barack Obama believes that it could undermine the final stage of sensitive negotiations. reflects the support of the members of the Democratic Party, which belongs to the Obama bill over concern in Washington about the threat posed by Iran and the concern of many members of Congress away from the process to contain this threat. In the wake of advertising to reach a framework agreement last week between Tehran and six world powers, the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China, stressed the members of Congress reaffirmed their support for the bill, which has the support of the Republican and Democratic parties and their quest to discuss ways to make it more acceptable to the White House. It goes Democrats and Republicans ahead with the bill, despite more or less what the White House that Obama has only the authority to negotiate and implement the agreement, which inhibit Iran whereby its nuclear program in exchange for a gradual easing of sanctions imposed on it and this is what reflects the unity of the difference between the legislative and executive institutions of America. The White House confirmed that Obama intends to use the veto power (veto) to block the bill in its current form. Although the Congress in the spring holiday, but the Democrats in the Senate are studying the bill drafted by Republican Bob Corker, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which can be approved by the Commission in a matter of days. was confirmed by Senator Bob Corker that “the White House has the right to declare what he wants or using Salouhyate as convenience, more importantly, that the Congress an important station to take a serious decision for the security of the world, and everyone respect this role.” He also stressed that the issues pertaining to the US strategic security matters “sensitive”. there is no room for any law eliminates the agreements with Iran Bernadette Meehan: a graduate of the Boston Institute of Political Science, and a spokeswoman for the National Security Council, having worked attached diplomacy in Iraq and accompany the former State Hillary Clinton was quoted many from news agencies spokeswoman National Security Council of the White House on behalf of Bernadette Meehan attentively statements when saying that “The president was clear when he said he is from the area now to leave any additional Act of Congress on Iran.” The observers confirmed that the official statement issued by the White House reflects a real crisis within the Obama administration as it faces a huge machine called the Congress will put all diplomatic his efforts in the negotiations with Iran to halt its nuclear program in the water. The spokeswoman National Security Council spokesman Bernadette Meehan added that if the “Send this bill (and mean project Senator Bob Corker) to the President Vsiatred him. ” Meehan confirmed that the United States “must give our negotiators a better chance of success rather than the complexity of their efforts.” devoted to US President Barack Obama, the coming weeks, to try to persuade Republicans and many Democrats in Congress not to derail the international negotiations on Iranian nuclear file before reaching a final agreement by 30 July , Obama urged members of Congress to rise above domestic political stakes, warning that any interference with them would increase the risk of a military confrontation. He told Obama that “if repealed by Congress this agreement, The United States will accuse derail diplomacy. ” Obama and contact personally with officials in Congress to prevent them from engaging in the draft law prepared by Bob Corker, as his advisers conducted dozens of communications with its members, but the Republicans have yet to surrender. Obama and the leaders of the White House seeks to derail the House of Representatives approves Democrats and Republicans on December Corker project, which is called spokespersons in the White House because intensify their statements recently on the subject of nuclear negotiations with Iran. Within the context of these statements Bernadette Meehan said that “members of Congress, led by Republicans seeking to disrupt the efforts of the White House in any way “. Which observers considered attempts to Republicans score points in preparation for the upcoming presidential elections after the end of Obama’s course in 2016. The president was clear when he said he is from the area now to leave any additional Act of Congress on Iran, but Vsistaml veto of President Barack Obama, who has long encouraged negotiation and diplomacy with Iran’s nuclear file, praises the agreement during a speech followed by the announcement of the results, which was on the lips of EU foreign minister Federica Mogerena Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, where he confirmed the signature on the initial agreement which drafted in its final form in this days. US President Barack Obama, who is the US presidency for the Democratic Party to reach a final nuclear deal with Iran before the end of the second and final term end of the year 2016 has been sought, which would make Obama goes to great lengths to prevent any attempt by the US Congress to disable this Agreement by imposing more of sanctions on Iran as a result of its nuclear program. The US President Barack Obama has threatened to veto against the draft passed by the Senate and allow Congress to review any agreement with Iran on its nuclear capabilities. In this context, the spokeswoman said the National Security Council of the White House on behalf of Bernadette Meehan The Congress chose the wrong time to challenge the results of the negotiations and agreements concluded, wondering “Why did not submit the draft MP Bob Corker law months ago?”. The Meehan said Obama’s comments, which urges congressmen to transcendence differences and political calculations and narrow interior in favor of maintaining the image of America and diplomacy and commitments at the international level. nuclear deal deepens reformers Iran and governors crisis witnessing the Iranian political arena difference in views between the two currents reformists and conservatives, on the background of the framework agreement reached by Tehran with the international community over its nuclear program. sees conservatives that the agreement is a violation of the red lines that announced by the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, in what is considered supporters of President Hassan Rohani, calculated on the reformist movement, that what has been reached, a successful foreign policy. And saw a meeting of the Committee on National Security and Foreign Policy in the Iranian parliament, debates between the two parties, and answered Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif on the Commission’s inquiries regarding the recent agreement. Conservatives contend exceeded government Rouhani red guide lines, while reformers confirms that they have achieved success , said the governor Jabbar Kodgka’s Attorney Journalism Iran, that the meeting saw Tlasna between committee member cream Kaddosa and Zarif, against the backdrop of the recent indictment not take into account Leader warnings to him at a special meeting on the nuclear file, while Zarif replied by saying, “You lie, and abusing such words to guide and his grievance, Valmrushd not AndPwYReni at all at that meeting. ” Khamenei has issued a statement in October last year, he stressed the “red lines” in the negotiations on its nuclear program with the group of countries (1 + 5). He stressed Leader in the statement published on its website to continue his research and development work in the field of nuclear energy and the need not to prejudice the negotiations gains made by Iran on the nuclear issue. The statement called on “International Atomic Energy Agency” to abandon its policy of critical, describing the nuclear facilities underground, near the city of Qom (which is about 157 km from the Iranian capital Tehran), establishments which “can not be Msasha.” The statement stressed that the negotiations should be limited to the nuclear issue and the lifting of economic sanctions on Iran, and that the negotiations with the States (1 + 5) caused damage to his country, pointing out that Iran needs to 190 thousand centrifuges, and that the group (1 + 5) has asked Iran to keep five thousand device, which led to the seventh round of negotiations witnessed by New York last September stopped. He also explained the statement issued by Khamenei, who is considered the highest religious and political authority in the State of “velayat-e faqih” system, to ignore the Iranian demands would mean failure to reach a final solution formula nuclear file with Western countries. The MP Iranian Hamid Rasayi, expressed reservations about the agreement, noting that pledges Tehran and clear, while the pledges of the other party is shrouded in mystery, wondering “Where is the principle of winner – winner in it,” as he put it. This came at a symposium organized by the Youth Club of Journalists of the body of Iranian radio and television, where he saw Rasayi that the agreement is contrary to the Constitution.