Maliki Iraqis the choice between survival or open the gates of hell

Maliki Iraqis the choice between survival or open the gates of hell

Posted 07/08/2014 08:36 AM

Put Iraqi Prime Minister outgoing Nuri al-Maliki, the Iraqi front of two choices only two either renew his mandate or open the gates of hell.

Maliki threats coincided with a widening circle of popular rejection of its continuation as prime minister for a third term, and in the wake of the National Alliance quest search for a successor to the owners

Maliki said in his weekly: Any attempt unconstitutional for the formation of a new government will open the gates of hell in the country.

This comes as announced old friends from within the alliance of religious parties and the Supreme Shiite Iran is not a place in the next stage as prime minister, despite desperate attempts to remain at the forefront of the scene.

Maliki in his weekly he was opposed to any foreign intervention in the matter, referring, apparently, to Iran, where officials have hinted that they lifted her hands from its old ally in the context of what promotes an agreement with the United States.

The Iranians senior officials have said that Iran believes that al-Maliki is no longer able to maintain the unity of the country and were looking for an alternative leader

The Iranian official said come to the conclusion that al-Maliki is no longer able to maintain the unity of Iraq, but Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani still has hope “in reference to the most revered Shi’ite cleric in Iraq. He added, “Ayatollah Sistani supports our vision now on al-Maliki.”

In parallel, a security official said a senior Iranian Tehran’s interest in stability in Iraq greater than the interest in supporting Maliki, who was endorsed for a long time, pointing out that “Iraq will be divided if al-Maliki remains in power,

Observers considered that Iran has sold Maliki considerations most important to its survival will open the doors of questioning in a political process that gives its allies and not others, eligibility for prime minister and control of key ministries (defense, interior, oil, finance), arguing that the Iranian leadership does not want to repeat the experiment Syria, where she had to interference with its weight to protect its ally Assad, raising the level of hostility in the region.

He guessed observers to be the position of the Iranian attempt to appease the American administration which practiced open slowly and cautiously on Tehran, and released some of its funds frozen, and cut from the Department of sanctions against its economy, what requires to make concessions Iranian in Iraq, as provided in Syria, where he imposed the Iranian leadership on Assad acceptance dismantle its arsenal of chemical to avoid strikes American uncertain time.

He did not rule analysts that Iran is instructed to reference the Supreme Shiite cleric Ali al-Sistani to hint repeatedly that al-Maliki is no longer a place, and that required the Prime Minister has the confidence of the Iraqi factions, and at the same time maintains the Iranian interests in Iraq by strengthening the influence of the religious parties linked to Iran.

And quickly pushed the instruction of these parties to the Iranian coup against al-Maliki, and profess to reject the continuation of the prime minister for a third session, which came on the tongue and prominent faces of these parties, the problem of the National Alliance (Shiite) such as Ammar al-Hakim and Muqtada al-Sadr.

Although al-Maliki was ruled in his account of Iran’s interests and consult with his allies in the religious parties, but everyone around him into a scapegoat to maintain the status quo in the political game list now.

He says old allies of the owners that he is no longer unwelcome person to assume the post of prime minister because of the failure of his policy in crisis management, security, and economic and files with the Kurdistan region as well as the culmination of setbacks security truncate large parts of Iraq by the organization “Islamic state”.

altahreernews.com