Legal proposing a constitutional amendment to determine the mandate of Prime Minister

MPs and legal proposing a constitutional amendment to determine the mandate of Prime Minister

29/08/2013 (00:01 pm)

BAGHDAD / Press-term

Experts confirmed the law to appeal the Federal Court’s proposal Law of the mandate of the three presidencies “It is true not dust it,” While the proposed Kurdistan Alliance, the Parliament studying the possibility of amending the Constitution about defines the mandate of the Prime Minister بدورتين two consecutive terms only and submitted to obtain the approval of the President, saw the Islamic Party Iraqi, that the veto “gives a justification for further domination and the imposition of the will.”
It was an Iraqi judicial source revealed on Monday (Press-term) of the Federal Court set aside the proposed law on the mandate of the three presidencies.
And sees the Kurdistan Alliance, the Federal Court “did not object to the substance of the proposal but its preparation method”, the Parliament proposes to study the possibility of amending the Constitution about state determines Prime Minister بدورتين of only two consecutive terms and submit it to obtain the approval of the President of the Republic. ”
He says Mahmoud Othman, Kurdistan Alliance MP said in an interview to (range Press), “The objection of the Federal Court on the constitutionality of the proposed law on the mandate of the three presidencies due to put before the House of Representatives,” and notes that “the court will not object to the content of the proposal if prepared by the Presidency of the Council of Ministers. ”
He adds Osman “From the beginning we pointed out an error in the proposed law to determine States because a president of the republic specific بدورتين, and the Speaker is elected by the House of Representatives, while they are choosing the head of the government by the bloc, which comes with more votes in the elections,” he adds, “better for Parliament recourse was to amend the constitution about state determines Prime Minister بدورتين of only two consecutive terms. ”
Explains the leader of the Kurdistan Alliance, that “the proposed law to determine the three states wrote urgently and involved a lot of gaps,” and believes that “What is required of the House of Representatives that currently studying the possibility of amending the constitution to limit the jurisdiction of the Prime Minister بدورتين consecutive terms only, and approve it, and then send العديل to the Presidency of the Republic for approval. ”
The Kurdistan Alliance, has confirmed early this August, his commitment to the decisions of the Federal Court on the Law of the mandate of the three presidencies, noting that the Court’s decisions “are final according to the Constitution.”
In turn, sees the Iraqi Islamic Party, to veto the proposed law “gives a justification for further domination and the imposition of the will,” and asserts that the Parliament is “determined the issue of the mandate of the three presidencies through the consensus of the political blocs, and those who object to the adoption of the method of political and legal framework for determining who will be the President the next government. ”
He says Salim al-MP for the Islamic Party, said in an interview to (range Press), “The Federal Court decision has become definitive, and everyone respect the rule of the judiciary”, and corrects, “but veto the proposed law on the mandate of the three presidencies, gives justification for further domination and the imposition of the will” .
It expresses Jubouri, expressed “hope not to be the decision resulted from political influences,” and shows that “Parliament is limited by the issue of the mandate of the three presidencies through the consensus of the political blocs, and those who object to the adoption of the method of political and legal framework for determining who will be prime minister next year.”
On the other hand a legal expert calls for Parliament to “accelerate to refer the proposal to the law itself to the Council of Ministers to invalidate the argument veto and discovery reservoir bugs”.
He says legal expert, Judge Wael Abdul Latif, in an interview to (range Press), “The proposed laws must go all to the Council of Ministers, prepared and attribute the parliament either form of the proposal or as a law,” and likely to “be set aside the Federal Court of the proposed law determine the mandate of the three presidencies for this reason. ”
Legal expert calls for Parliament to “accelerate the transfer of the same law proposal to the Council of Ministers, based on the decision of the Federal Court,” it continues, “would detect the defect and whether in the cabinet or the Federal Court.”
It stresses Abdul Latif, that “the Constitution even though he did not specify the issue of the mandate of the Prime Minister but he did not divorce her because a particular person, but for the parliamentary bloc the most numerous that are nominated prime minister does not make sense to keep this mass associated with a coalition of state law and the National Alliance, without a variables in the Iraqi arena. ”
Meanwhile, is professor of law, that “set aside the Federal Tribunal for the Law of the mandate of the three presidencies incorrect and dust it legally.” In the view of Malik Dohan Al Hassan, Professor of Law and Justice Minister former, in an interview to (range Press), that “the constitutional text confirms that the President of the Republic choose from the largest parliamentary bloc number, Chairman of the Council of Ministers,” and adds that there is “a text constitutionally determined for the chairmanship Republic only بدورتين, with no similar provision for the term of office of the prime minister, and thus is the original passport. ”
It is noteworthy Hassan, that although “the fact that the mandate of Prime Minister constitute a demand public and parliamentarians, but the law can not amend the Constitution voted by the people,” explains that “the ordinary law is the decision of the Parliament, and there is no provision in the Constitution, While the constitutional provisions is higher than the legally may not be a law of Parliament in violation of the text of the Constitution. ”
The former minister, to “set aside the Federal Tribunal for the Law of the mandate of the three presidencies incorrect and dust it legally.”

almadapaper.net